How Crypto Miners Stabilize Electrical Grids: Addressing FUD & Myths

The narrative suggests Bitcoin mining wastes energy and destabilizes grids. The reality is that Texas grid operators are paying Bitcoin miners to shut down during peak demand, preventing blackouts. It is also a critical factor for measuring BTC price movement.

The common criticism that crypto mining wastes energy and strains electrical grids misses the emerging reality that flexible mining operations actually help stabilize grids, monetize excess renewable energy, and provide valuable demand response services.

According to the US Energy Information Administration, large flexible load demand, including crypto mining in Texas, could total 54 billion kilowatthours in 2025, up almost 60% from expected demand in 2024.

Annual ERCOT net energy for load with details for large flexible load demand. Source: US Energy Information Administration

This article addresses FUD about crypto mining’s energy impact, explains how miners stabilize electrical grids, the concept of demand response, real-world examples in Texas and beyond, benefits for renewable energy, and the future of mining as grid infrastructure.

Understanding Electrical Grid Challenges

Supply-Demand Balance

Grids must constantly match electricity supply with demand or face instability. Even small imbalances can cause frequency deviations that damage equipment and cause blackouts.

Peak Demand Problems

During the August 2023 Texas heatwave, ERCOT set a record peak demand of 85,435 MW on August 10, prompting multiple voluntary conservation calls as reserves dipped critically low.

The grid avoided blackouts by deploying all available generation, including emergency reserves, amid triple-digit temperatures and low wind output, with real-time prices spiking over $5,000/MWh.

Renewable Intermittency

Solar and wind produce power inconsistently. Wind generation in West Texas fluctuates with weather patterns, creating challenges for grid operators trying to balance supply and demand.

Baseload vs Peak

Constant baseload power costs less than expensive peak capacity. Traditional solutions involve gas peaker plants that sit idle most of the year but cost billions to maintain.

Curtailment Waste

Excess renewable energy is often wasted when production exceeds demand. This curtailed energy represents lost revenue for renewable projects and wasted clean power.

How Crypto Mining Provides Demand Response

Crypto miners can shut down instantly when the grid needs capacity, unlike most industrial users. Bitcoin miners in ERCOT, now representing 3.5 to 4 gigawatts of load, have become uniquely valuable grid partners by instantly curtailing during scarcity events.

Miners profit by shutting down during high electricity prices and mining during cheap periods. Most Bitcoin miners sign contracts to buy electricity at a set rate, and they are allowed to sell that power to the rest of the users on the grid through ERCOT’s wholesale market. Grid operators pay miners to provide demand response. During the August 2023 heatwave, ERCOT paid Riot Platforms $31.7 million to shut down its computers, according to CNBC.

Daniel Batten, Bitcoin mining analyst, highlights how miners provide precise frequency regulation by ramping load up/down in seconds (kilowatt precision), stabilizing grids against fluctuations from renewables or outages far better than traditional industry (10MW+ adjustments). This “flexible load” earned miners $1.7 billion+ in US grid payments (2024), preventing blackouts while monetizing excess energy.

Texas miners routinely shut down during heat waves, freeing up gigawatts for air conditioning. This demand response helped ERCOT avoid the catastrophic blackouts that plagued the state in 2021.

Monetizing Excess Renewable Energy

Wind and solar often produce more power than the grid can use, which is wasted. According to S&P Global, roughly 10 gigawatts of solar came online in 2023, followed by another 10 gigawatts in 2024, plus about 5 gigawatts of battery storage.

Miners provide guaranteed demand for excess renewable energy that would otherwise be curtailed. This off-peak demand allows renewable projects to sell energy that would otherwise be wasted and increases overall utilization.

Mining can make remote wind or solar projects economically viable by providing local demand. The emergence of crypto mining in Texas has coincided with a rise in renewable generation projects, both industries cropping up in remote regions of West Texas.

While renewable energy generation rises and falls with weather patterns, mining facilities can flexibly ramp up or down operations according to the real-time availability of cheap renewable energy.

Bitcoin miners co-located with wind farms prevent curtailment, creating symbiotic relationships where both industries benefit from each other’s presence.

Real-World Examples and Scale

In June 2024, ERCOT estimated that cryptocurrency mining could draw an estimated 2,600 megawatts of power from the grid, about as much electricity demand as the city of Austin on an above-average day.

The utility company AEP announced that 5,000 more megawatts of cryptocurrency mines are planned to connect to the grid in the company’s service territory within Texas.

In November 2024, Texas regulators voted to require mining facilities consuming more than 75 megawatts to register with the commission.

Environmental and Economic Benefits

Using excess renewable energy for mining is better than wasting it. Every kilowatt-hour that goes to mining instead of being curtailed represents improved renewable economics.

Guaranteed mining demand also makes renewable projects more financially viable, accelerating the deployment of clean energy infrastructure.

Likewise, demand response payments from miners help fund grid infrastructure. The revenue generators received from demand response improve overall project economics.

Mining brings economic activity to remote areas with stranded energy resources, creating jobs and tax revenue in underserved regions.

Addressing Common Myths and FUD

One common mining myth is that it wastes energy. In reality, mining provides valuable grid services and monetizes otherwise-wasted energy. Bitcoin analyst Daniel Batten stated that Bitcoin plays a vital part in ERCOT’s demand response program, which has helped to stabilize the grid.

Another myth is that mining causes blackouts. However, flexible mining actually prevents blackouts by reducing demand during emergencies. Miners were instrumental in helping ERCOT avoid blackouts during recent heat waves.

Miners also typically shut down when residential demand is high. The $31.7 million paid to Riot Platforms demonstrates miners curtailing during peak residential demand. In most cases, mining improves grid economics. Analysis suggests Bitcoin mining saved Texans $18 billion by reducing the need for expensive peaker plants.

As Jesse Peltan, CTO of HODL Ranch, noted, treating Bitcoin as a silver bullet solution misrepresents its capabilities. Bitcoin is not by itself going to fix the grid, but it can be a valuable component of grid stability. The ability to instantly swap crypto during a peak event highlights their unique value proposition.

Challenges and Considerations

Not All Mining Is Flexible

Only large, sophisticated operations can provide demand response. ERCOT defines large flexible loads as facilities with expected peak demand capacity of 75 megawatts or greater.

Location Matters

Mining only helps grids where it’s integrated with grid operators. Proper coordination with ERCOT is essential for mining to provide grid benefits.

Regulatory Uncertainty

ERCOT is tracking 1,881 active generation interconnection requests totaling 371,689 megawatts as of September 30, 2024, creating uncertainty about future grid capacity.

Balancing Act

ERCOT anticipates about 152 gigawatts of new load by 2030, driven by data centers and electrification, requiring careful management.

ERCOT Annual Energy Forecast. Source: ERCOT

Conclusion

While crypto mining’s energy consumption is real, the narrative that it only harms grids is outdated FUD. Modern, grid-integrated mining operations provide valuable demand response services, monetize excess renewable energy, and help stabilize electrical grids.

Bitcoin miners in ERCOT convert electrons directly into money with no downstream customers, allowing precise, machine-level control and pure responsiveness to real-time prices. Within Texas’s deregulated energy-only market, they help flatten price spikes, improve utilization of stranded wind and solar, and participate in ancillary services.

Far from being parasitic, well-designed mining can be symbiotic with energy infrastructure. The EIA projects that expected demand from large flexible load customers would represent about 10% of total forecast electricity consumption on the ERCOT grid in 2025.

Understand the full picture of crypto and energy with Digitap. Our platform provides fact-based analysis beyond the FUD. Join Digitap today.

FAQ

Do Crypto Miners Help Electrical Grids?

Yes, miners provide flexible demand response, curtailing load during peaks (e.g., Riot freed 84,000+ MWh in Texas 2023 heatwave for $31.7M credits) and absorbing excess renewable output, stabilizing frequency at kilowatt precision better than the traditional industry.​

How Miners Provide Demand Response

Miners ramp operations up/down in seconds via software, responding to grid signals for ancillary services like frequency regulation, earning payments while preventing blackouts during high demand from heatwaves or low renewables.​

Bitcoin Mining Renewable Energy Use

52.4% sustainable (42.6% renewables like hydro 23.4%/wind 15.4%, plus 9.8% nuclear) per 2025 Cambridge study of 48% hash rate; up from 37.6% in 2022, with coal dropping to 8.9%.​

Why Texas Works with Bitcoin Miners

ERCOT pays miners millions (e.g., $31.7M to Riot Aug 2023) for rapid curtailment during record 85GW+ peaks, as mining’s flexibility complements intermittent wind/solar without long-term contracts.​

Is Crypto Mining Environmentally Friendly?

Partially, 52%+ sustainable energy exceeds global averages, incentivizes stranded renewables, but natural gas (38%) and scale raise concerns.